On the bridge crossing.
One thing mentioned is a bridge adjacent to the CF Memorial. This will cause some problems but lets compare the CF to the new bridge side by side. Lets assume the NEW BRIDGE (NB) is a concrete plain, less costly structure like the I-140 bridge crossing.
CF, when raised is 135 feet above water. We are assuming the new bridge to be 135 to 140 feet but the NB will be stationary so the ramp up and down will have to be extended outwards so the roadway is not too steep. IF I remember correctly this would make the Wilmington take off to be around 5th or 6th streets and the landing would be near or past the 421 exit – which is problematic.
So, to me, a bridge should be further down the CF – and the Independence corridor is a good choice – but the CF is wider at that point – adding to the cost. I think a tunnel along the Independence/133 route would be feasible if not desirable.
It’s going to be costly no matter what but tunnels are advantageous in that crossings can take place safely in high winds and freezing temps with no problems. My concern remains that a Independence/133 crossing may not be used as much by motorists due to the extra travel involved. We are, by nature, a lazy lot, and we desire way too much convenience in our lives.
Regarding the crossing
On the bridge crossing.
One thing mentioned is a bridge adjacent to the CF Memorial. This will cause some problems but lets compare the CF to the new bridge side by side. Lets assume the NEW BRIDGE (NB) is a concrete plain, less costly structure like the I-140 bridge crossing.
CF, when raised is 135 feet above water. We are assuming the new bridge to be 135 to 140 feet but the NB will be stationary so the ramp up and down will have to be extended outwards so the roadway is not too steep. IF I remember correctly this would make the Wilmington take off to be around 5th or 6th streets and the landing would be near or past the 421 exit – which is problematic.
So, to me, a bridge should be further down the CF – and the Independence corridor is a good choice – but the CF is wider at that point – adding to the cost. I think a tunnel along the Independence/133 route would be feasible if not desirable.
It’s going to be costly no matter what but tunnels are advantageous in that crossings can take place safely in high winds and freezing temps with no problems. My concern remains that a Independence/133 crossing may not be used as much by motorists due to the extra travel involved. We are, by nature, a lazy lot, and we desire way too much convenience in our lives.
Vog