Submitted by Guest211 (not verified) on Tue, 12/25/2012 - 6:22pm.
THE MILITARY IN A WAR SITUATION AND DOMESTIC LIFE, ARE TWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. I MAYBE WRONG, BUT I DON;T KNOW OF ANY PLACE IN THE UNITED STATES THAT NEEDS ASSULT AND RAPID FIRE WEAPONS AND MULTI CLIPS OF AMMO. THEY NEED TO BE BANNED. PERIOD. THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IS OUTDATED. WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN, THERE WERN'T ANY ASSULT RIFLES AND ALL OF THE ADVANCED WEAPONS OF TODAY. AS TO YOUR LAST STATEMENT, I DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT BY FORCE. I ALWAYS THOUGHT IT WAS TO PROTECT YOUR FAMILY AND TO HUNT FOE FOOD. BUT THEN, THERES A LOT I DON'T KNOW.ESPECIALLY IN TODAYS WORLD.
7969
THE MILITARY IN A WAR SITUATION AND DOMESTIC LIFE, ARE TWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. I MAYBE WRONG, BUT I DON;T KNOW OF ANY PLACE IN THE UNITED STATES THAT NEEDS ASSULT AND RAPID FIRE WEAPONS AND MULTI CLIPS OF AMMO. THEY NEED TO BE BANNED. PERIOD. THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IS OUTDATED. WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN, THERE WERN'T ANY ASSULT RIFLES AND ALL OF THE ADVANCED WEAPONS OF TODAY. AS TO YOUR LAST STATEMENT, I DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT BY FORCE. I ALWAYS THOUGHT IT WAS TO PROTECT YOUR FAMILY AND TO HUNT FOE FOOD. BUT THEN, THERES A LOT I DON'T KNOW.ESPECIALLY IN TODAYS WORLD.