Submitted by Guest211 (not verified) on Tue, 12/25/2012 - 4:25pm.
I DON'T THINK THE LADY IS AN IDIOT AT ALL. FIRST OF ALL, IT WASN'T YOUR DAUGHTER KILLED, NO MATTER WHAT THE REASON OR THE WEAPON. WHAT?--- DOES ANYONE NEED AN ASSULT RIFLE OR RAPID FIRE AND MULTIPLE CLIPS FOR? I AGREE THAT THEY SHOULD BE BANNED. GUN SALES SHOULD BE CLOSELY MONITORED. GRANTED, PEOPLE FIRE THE GUN, BUT IF THEY WEREN'T SO READILY AVAILABLE, PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE THEM TO SHOOT OTHERS WITH. AS FAR AS THE 2ND AMENDMENT GOES, HOW MANY YEARS AGO WAS IT MADE? MAYBE IT NEEDS TO BE REWRITTEN. IT WAS BEFORE WE HAD LAWS, AND MOST PEOPLE HAD TO HUNT GAME FOR A LIVING, AND PROTECT THEIR FAMILIES FROM RAIDERS AND INDIANS. WE DON;T HAVE THAT ANY MORE.
GUESSTTR
I DON'T THINK THE LADY IS AN IDIOT AT ALL. FIRST OF ALL, IT WASN'T YOUR DAUGHTER KILLED, NO MATTER WHAT THE REASON OR THE WEAPON. WHAT?--- DOES ANYONE NEED AN ASSULT RIFLE OR RAPID FIRE AND MULTIPLE CLIPS FOR? I AGREE THAT THEY SHOULD BE BANNED. GUN SALES SHOULD BE CLOSELY MONITORED. GRANTED, PEOPLE FIRE THE GUN, BUT IF THEY WEREN'T SO READILY AVAILABLE, PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE THEM TO SHOOT OTHERS WITH. AS FAR AS THE 2ND AMENDMENT GOES, HOW MANY YEARS AGO WAS IT MADE? MAYBE IT NEEDS TO BE REWRITTEN. IT WAS BEFORE WE HAD LAWS, AND MOST PEOPLE HAD TO HUNT GAME FOR A LIVING, AND PROTECT THEIR FAMILIES FROM RAIDERS AND INDIANS. WE DON;T HAVE THAT ANY MORE.