you very clearly referred to me as white as though that is relevant.

You have yet to give a clear answer as to why the Gaurd's presence had any bearing on their guilt or innocence. It's real simple; they either did the deed or they did not.

And no, my thinking was not that the Gaurd should have locked and loaded their weapons and killed them. I noted what could have happened had the Gaurd been present. Big difference.

Quit trying to put words into my posts. Answer the question if that is at all possible. Did they or did they not do the deed?