make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login


I have no idea.
But it doesn't matter does it?
In many criminal cases there is physical evidence to go along with eyewitness or video evidence.
From what I've read - in this case there was no physical evidence ONLY eyewitness accounts, and those accounts changed VOLUNTARILY, and INDEPENDENTLY of each other.
As to why Sleasely didn't do it? Don't have a clue on that either Tom. Maybe he suffered from "Low T"? "No-T"?
Perdue DID say she had new evidence that clearly shows racism played a key role on the prosecutors side - perhaps Eaesley didn't have that info? So that for him the overturning of the conviction was enough?
This case was not handled well from the start - the Fed Court saw parts of that and overturned the convictions.
Bev got even more info and issued the pardon of clemency.
She did RIGHT Tom - give credit where it's due because it appears as though she's due the credit for this one.



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.