Submitted by Rob Surf City (not verified) on Fri, 01/25/2013 - 10:59am.
Come on guys. Just because she is a judge she is still entitled to sue for slander or libel if the jury determines that is what it was.
The true issue at hand is , if she prevails, to compensate her for the damage done to her reputation as she so stated. I encourage the jury to think hard and follow my advice.
I think her reputation value is worth One ($1) dollar, yes only one dollar, and that is my constitutional right to freely express my opinion.
Award her that dollar and send her back to doing whatever it is only she thinks she does so well.
Her Reputation has value
Come on guys. Just because she is a judge she is still entitled to sue for slander or libel if the jury determines that is what it was.
The true issue at hand is , if she prevails, to compensate her for the damage done to her reputation as she so stated. I encourage the jury to think hard and follow my advice.
I think her reputation value is worth One ($1) dollar, yes only one dollar, and that is my constitutional right to freely express my opinion.
Award her that dollar and send her back to doing whatever it is only she thinks she does so well.