Submitted by alexes (not verified) on Fri, 03/15/2013 - 11:28am.
many people might not under stand what this question means. you asked it very awkwardly.
to end the moratorium would mean to allow the death penalty again - many people might think that by voting "yes" they are actually voting against the death penalty, because it looks like they are voting yes to ending it.
the death penalty has shown again and again to kill innocents, to have no effect on crime rates and to focus mainly on black people.
as it is useless as a deterrent (look up the studies), as it mainly targets black people, and as it has killed so many innocents in horrific ways, i think it should be something relegated to the past, and instead we should have working jails, where one must earn one's dinner.
don't end the moratorim
many people might not under stand what this question means. you asked it very awkwardly.
to end the moratorium would mean to allow the death penalty again - many people might think that by voting "yes" they are actually voting against the death penalty, because it looks like they are voting yes to ending it.
the death penalty has shown again and again to kill innocents, to have no effect on crime rates and to focus mainly on black people.
as it is useless as a deterrent (look up the studies), as it mainly targets black people, and as it has killed so many innocents in horrific ways, i think it should be something relegated to the past, and instead we should have working jails, where one must earn one's dinner.