Info

If the Chancellor directed the committee to consider actions to attain "national prominence" as the study report indicates, how do you recommend cutting a program (swim/dive) that has 12 conference titles in the past 12 years and recommend keeping a program (men's basketball) that has only 10 wins in each of its last two seasons? It seems clear that 12 conference titles in 12 years attains much more "national prominence" than a cellar dwelling basketball team. My opinion is the committee had the desired answer before the process started.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
Please re-enter the code shown in the image below.

Reply