Nicely done Supreme Court.
Finally a judicial decision that will HELP with solving past crimes and keep REPEAT criminals off the streets longer.
Anyone who objects to this must not want to be caught for various transgressions they've committed in the past or knows somebody else with the same situation.
I would go so far as require DNA swabbing for all children in schools so as to have a record should they be abducted, killed going to or from school, or hurt or killed in tornado's.
This would make identification complete and verifiable.
Why rail against this? We are going to eventually get drug testing for entitlement seekers. We pee in cups for many employers nowadays as well as allow for credit and criminal background checks to get a job.
So how could ANYONE say the government is getting too personal with this, heck they're already at a police station for something. If we can solve just ONE past crime? It's worth the effort.
More information about formatting options