How could any one think this has anything to do with a woman's rights to choose? What about the rights of the child Maria Lauterbach was carrying? Obviously Lauterbach had already made her choice to give her child life. Laurean took her woman's right to choose away. Did Boseman ever stop to think that one day that child could have been a woman too? Is the only time we consider them a worthy of laws to protect them once the are a live birth and then a potential voter? If someone kills a pregnant woman or harms her in any way that causes her to loose her unborn child that person is taking away a "woman's right to choose" just as much as any law would. Shouldn't Boseman be fighting just as hard against these murders as she is against this fetal homicide law? Maybe she isn't for a woman's right to choose as she says she is.