make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

Yes, the owners were not responsible...

Yes, the owners were not at all responsible for the dog, but the dog could've been taken from his owners, tested for adoption suitability and then put up for adoption, if possible. The owners should have had to pay for all of this, too and be charged with negligence and not be allowed to own any more dogs until they can prove they know how to care for them. The dog got into a fight with it's "son" as I understand it, and not a neighbor's animal or a human, so it just doesn't make sense to put it to sleep, if it didn't hurt the dog or a person. We are getting into a dangerous area when we make judgements on what someone/thing "might" do, in the future, since none of us can know the future.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.