make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

Confusion surrounds new cancer screening recommendations

READ MORE:

» e-mail this story | discuss | print

Confusion surrounds new cancer screening recommendations
screenings300.jpg

Doctor Sandra Hall has been busy fielding calls from patients concerned about new pap smear and mammogram recommendations. Last week, a government task force said women should not start getting mammograms at age forty - instead, they should wait until they turn fifty.

“They said from age 40 to 49 that benefit was small, they would have to screen 1,900 women to save one woman's life compared to age 50 to 59 where you'd have to screen about 1,300 women. They're not saying there isn't a benefit; they're saying it's small,” explained Dr. Sandra Hall.

While that was sinking in, women under thirty were then told annual pap smears were no longer needed. They were told that an exam every two years would be enough to catch slow-growing cervical cancer.

Dr. Hall said, “It can take ten, sometimes 20 years to grow. We know a lot more about cervical cancer these days, about the HPV virus that causes cervical cancer, and it isn't women being screened dying from cervical cancer, it's women who aren't being screened.”

Still, Doctor Hall said it is important to remember this task force is made up of people who aren't oncologists, treating cancer on a regular basis. These recommendations do not apply to everyone, especially if you have ever had an abnormal pap smear or a history of cancer in your family.

“I think the most important thing is to talk to your doctor. Your individual risk is so important and these are general recommendations, they're not mandates,” added Dr. Hall.

So even though it is now recommended that women under thirty, who have never had an abnormal pap smear, wait two years between tests, Doctor Hall said you still need a pelvic exam every year.

» Post to Del.icio.us Share on Facebook Post to Digg Post to Reddit

Disclaimer: Comments posted on this, or any story are opinions of those people posting them, and not the views or opinions of WWAY NewsChannel 3, its management or employees. You can view our comment policy here.

»

Rest Assured

this is only the tip of the iceberg should the Pelosi/Reed health care proposals be enacted into law.

Use diabetic testing appartus? Watch it get taxed.

65 or over -- get ready for counseling on "painless" end of life proceedures.

Heart related issues -- need a pacemaker? Wait for the health czar to approve and then pay the tax on it.

These are only the tip of the iceberg.

If you voted for the Annointed One and his giddy headed band of thieves in Congress -- you're about to get what he did not tell you.

Yea Tom

they will soon be getting the exact change they voted for. Your right... This is a very small glimpse into what the future for our healthcare holds if this bill passes. Thank you America. Elections have consequences!!!

LoL yep.. LoL

Thats cause Obama's chief Med Staff chicky is a nut job who went against industry experts...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.