Submitted by ChefnSurf (not verified) on Mon, 02/13/2012 - 11:37am.
That choice would be: "No, it violates the concept of seperation between church and state." Regardless of my personal beliefs concerning contraception, that principle should still apply. Hey, if the church can't tell the state what to do, the opposite should also be valid.
Submitted by tElaine Warren (not verified) on Sat, 02/11/2012 - 7:24pm.
Religious organizations are only being asked to offer birth control to their employees along with the rest of the medical coverage. No one is forcing them to use birth control. This is so silly. Coverage should be all inclusive.
Submitted by Erlkoenig (not verified) on Mon, 02/13/2012 - 8:39pm.
E.W. “Religious organizations are only being asked to offer birth control to their employees along with the rest of the medical coverage. No one is forcing them to use birth control. This is so silly. Coverage should be all inclusive.”
OK, they don’t have to use it but should be forced to pay for it? Do you libs every critique the crap you write?? This is un-American. Where is the “Separation of Church and State” crowd now.
Submitted by Guest1234 (not verified) on Sun, 02/12/2012 - 9:53pm.
WOW! You are missing the boat here. You are correct no one is forcing anyone to use birth control. However, NO ONE should force the Catholic church to pay for something or provide something that is in direct violation of their religious beliefs.....just sayin'
Submitted by Guest28451 (not verified) on Sat, 02/11/2012 - 6:15pm.
As far as I knew it was always going to be on the insurance companies to cover Birth Control. This idiotic compromise is nothign but hot air. The hosptials and religious employers dont provide them now and wouldnt it would be by the insurance carriers these employers used so this is nothing but a bunch of political double speak period!
Submitted by robo (not verified) on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 8:02pm.
Contraceptives should not be provide free under any circumstance. They should be an option paid for by those who choose to use them. Why should others pay in their insurance costs for someone else's birth control?
An obvious choice has been omitted
That choice would be: "No, it violates the concept of seperation between church and state." Regardless of my personal beliefs concerning contraception, that principle should still apply. Hey, if the church can't tell the state what to do, the opposite should also be valid.
birth control
This doesn't matter really. The people who NEED to be on birth control don't have jobs.
Birth control coverage
Religious organizations are only being asked to offer birth control to their employees along with the rest of the medical coverage. No one is forcing them to use birth control. This is so silly. Coverage should be all inclusive.
E.W. “Religious
E.W. “Religious organizations are only being asked to offer birth control to their employees along with the rest of the medical coverage. No one is forcing them to use birth control. This is so silly. Coverage should be all inclusive.”
OK, they don’t have to use it but should be forced to pay for it? Do you libs every critique the crap you write?? This is un-American. Where is the “Separation of Church and State” crowd now.
WOW! You are missing the
WOW! You are missing the boat here. You are correct no one is forcing anyone to use birth control. However, NO ONE should force the Catholic church to pay for something or provide something that is in direct violation of their religious beliefs.....just sayin'
another way the government
another way the government wants to help irresponsible people get the easy way out/
Who here bought that line of crap Obama spewed
As far as I knew it was always going to be on the insurance companies to cover Birth Control. This idiotic compromise is nothign but hot air. The hosptials and religious employers dont provide them now and wouldnt it would be by the insurance carriers these employers used so this is nothing but a bunch of political double speak period!
Birth control coverage in insurance
Contraceptives should not be provide free under any circumstance. They should be an option paid for by those who choose to use them. Why should others pay in their insurance costs for someone else's birth control?