WILMINGTON, NC (WWAY) — After years of advocating, parents and law enforcement may finally get the change they have been asking for in the justice system.
Bipartisan legislation announced yesterday would end the automatic adult prosecution of 16 and 17-year-olds in North Carolina.
“Life is not black and white,” Wilmington resident Rodney Robbins said. “It’s not conservative or liberal. It’s generally grey.”
“He was a teenager, 16, 17-years-old, and he essentially broke the law,” Robbins said. “It was some vandalism.”
Because of a law that is only in North Carolina and New York, Justin was prosecuted as an adult.
“My son has some developmental disabilities, which make it hard for him to find employment under the best of circumstances, but with this extra mark, it continues to haunt him,” Robbins said.
For the last 22 years, Robbins has gone to lawmakers, attended public meetings, and written blogs.
“My son is kind of immune to it,” Robbins said. “You know, he’s kind of resigned in the fact that he’ll have this forever, and I tell him, ‘No. We’re not going to give up.'”
It is a law District Attorney Ben David has also spent years trying to get changed.
“I think one reason that it’s taken this long is adequate funding,” David said.
After years of failed bills, years of fighting, there is a glimpse of hope.
“What I admire the chief justice for is he’s gone straight to the legislature and said here’s what it’s going to take,” David said.
While David said this new proposal has a good chance of passing, there are certain things that will never change.
“We are going to continue to hold people fully accountable for violent crimes, things like sex offenses and murder, and unfortunately very young people commit those crimes,” David said.
While this proposal may never change anything for the Robbins family, the change in law is what he has been fighting for.
“You know it might not affect my son, but it’ll affect someone else’s son,” Robbins said.
David said the chief justice’s proposal has this law going into effect in 2019, so that funding can be figured out before then. Lawmakers still have to vote on the proposal.