RALEIGH (AP) -- The North Carolina Court of Appeals has upheld a 2004 law widening a ban against felons owning weapons.
But yesterday's split decision opens the possibility that the prohibition on owning nearly any kind of gun could be overturned.
The law was changed in 2004 as part of an anti-domestic violence bill. The earlier version had barred felons from owning or possessing pistols and short-barreled weapons that are easy to hide.
Judge Wanda Bryant says the 2004 law protects the public. Judge Linda McGee agreed with Bryant. But Judge Rick Elmore dissented, saying the 2004 changes make the law unconstitutional by punishing felons rather than just regulating some guns.
Barney Britt of Wake County says there should be a procedure to get some gun rights restored for convicted felons.
(Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

law unconstitutional
U.S verses thomas franklin essick 1990 4th circuit court of appeals greensboro N.C judge K.K Hall and barney w britt verses state of N.C aug29th 2009 in the britt case how does a law written in 1776 only apply to him who was not even born till some 200 years later? this law violates the 2nd,3rd,4th,5th,6th,7th,8th and 14th ammendment to the U.S constitution the N.C legislature in 2004 committed a felony(title 18 section 241 of the U.S constitution by enacting this law)it's called expostfacto law(after the fact or retroactive)a person convicted of a felony back prior to 1996 was told not to possess a firearm for 5 years this is just like passing double jeporady on a person&convicting one without due process of law.even the russian and Iranian constitutions ban expostfacto law. the N.C legislature should be charged with conspiracy.read the 9th ammendment to the U.S constitution and the 10th ammendment to the N.C constitution.
I was convicted 13 years ago
I'd like to say one thing to
Has Florida got it right?
Once a felon always a felon?