make WWAY your homepage  Become a fan on facebook  Follow us on twitter  Receive RSS Newsfeeds  MEMBERS: Register | Login

Trooper gets four-day suspension

READ MORE:
andrew-smith.jpg

RALEIGH, NC (WTVD) -- The North Carolina Highway Patrol said Wednesday that one of two troopers involved in an incident with the wife of a Raleigh attorney has been given a four-day suspension without pay as punishment.

Trooper Andrew Smith will begin serving the suspension immediately.

The suspension comes after an internal investigation concluded Smith's behavior was unprofessional and violated the Highway Patrol's conduct policy.

The investigation came after the Highway Patrol received a letter of complaint from Hoyt Tessener, a Raleigh lawyer, alleging misconduct by Trooper Edward Wyrick during a traffic stop of his wife, Gina Tessener.

The Tesseners said Wyrick was bullying and overly aggressive.

During their investigation, the Highway Patrol released text messages exchanged between Trooper Smith and Trooper Wyrick in reference to pulling over Gina Tessener.

The Tesseners, who are from Raleigh, were in Wilmington on June 22 attending an event. Hoyt was following his wife in a separate car when she was pulled over by Wyrick.

Trooper Wyrick says he stopped Gina for a broken headlight, however, smelled alcohol on her and asked her to complete a field sobriety test, but she refused.

"This woman refused all roadside testing, and blew .00," Wyrick wrote in a text to Smith. "Her husband is a trial lawyer and told me I should be ashamed of myself."

Smith responded: "Hahahaha f--- her and f--- him. She say how much she'd had to drink?"

"She said 1 drink at 7pm," Wyrick wrote back.

"F--- her," Smith responded.

After reviewing the case, the Highway Patrol said Trooper Wyrick was justified in pulling over Gina Tessener and had probable cause for a DWI arrest.

Disclaimer: Comments posted on this, or any story are opinions of those people posting them, and not the views or opinions of WWAY NewsChannel 3, its management or employees. You can view our comment policy here.

»

what you need to do is start over

And read the whole story from start to finish because you missed alot of it

Facts?

Based on previous news articles, the officers' phones were not supplied by the state. They are "personal" phones. They didn't have to divulge their texts, but did so to show they didn't set anyone up. The only messages sent via government-owned network were after Mr. Tressenor was pulled over and let off without a citation.

no mr. get your fact

no mr. get your fact straight, it was on thier personal phones stupid!

Riiiiiiiiiiight...because

Riiiiiiiiiiight...because your "facts" are "straight". *roll eyes*

Obviously, you haven't read

Obviously, you haven't read the story either because you don't have any of the facts straight. Trying reviewing the previous stories before you make inane (i.e. stupid, silly) remarks.