State board sets May, September dates for primary and general election

RALEIGH, NC (AP/WWAY) — North Carolina officials set a Sept. 10 date for a new election for the nation’s last unresolved congressional race after the November results were thrown out over concerns of ballot tampering. Parties will hold their primaries on May 14.

The state elections board determined that a new election was needed in the 9th congressional district after hearing days of evidence that tended to show a political operative working for Republican candidate Mark Harris hired people to collect mail-in ballots. The board acted because ballots were vulnerable to being changed or discarded.

North Carolina law prohibits anyone other than a voter or immediate family member from handling a mail-in ballot.

Harris had narrowly led Democrat Dan McCready, but before the elections board refused to certify November’s results pending an investigation. McCready is running again in the new election. Harris isn’t, citing health problems.

The operative Harris sought out and lined up ahead of his 2018 Republican primary, Leslie McCrae Dowless, was charged last week with seven low-level felonies, including ballot possession and obstruction of justice. The charges involve Dowless’ work for Harris in the 2018 Republican primary, for 9th district congressional candidate Todd Johnson in the 2016 primary, and other work he did in the 2016 general election.

Prosecutors are still investigating evidence of ballot tampering by Dowless and others during the November election for the 9th District, which includes part of Charlotte and extends eastward across several counties.

Harris has not been charged with a crime and has denied knowledge of any illegal practices by those involved with his campaign. But he too could come under scrutiny: He admitted in last month’s board meeting to writing personal checks to Dowless in 2017, a potential violation if the payments weren’t reported.

The North Carolina scandal represents the rare case of a federal election nullified and redone because of fraud.

In 1887, the U.S. House of Representatives vacated the seat Rhode Island’s William Pirce seemingly won in November 1884 after evidence of fraud raised doubts about whether the Republican won a majority of votes, noted University of Minnesota research fellow Eric Ostermeier. The U.S. House Committee on Elections received sworn testimony from several voters who said they were paid $2 to $3 to back Pirce, Ostermeier said. A special election was held the next month and this time the Democrat, Charles Page, defeated Pirce and served for the final 10 days of that congressional session.

Sixty years earlier, election fraud — which Ostermeier said was far from rare in the 19th century — might have cost John Calhoon his initial win in a special House election. It’s not clear why, but the votes from one central Kentucky county were thrown out in 1827 “owing to an irregularity,” the U.S. House biography of Calhoon’s rival, Thomas Chilton, states. Both men petitioned the governor for a redo election, which Chilton won. Calhoon would go on to serve four years in the House in the 1830s.

The House elections committee also voided the 1806 victory of John Culpepper in a North Carolina congressional district, Ostermeier said. The Federalist had been in Congress for nearly a year when the committee found irregularities in three of the district’s five counties and concluded, “It is most proper to give the citizens of that district an opportunity to have another election.”

Bladen County District 3 Commissioner Russell Priest, one of the only elected officials impacted by the State Elections Board vote for a new election, made the trip to Raleigh on Monday to hear from State Board of Elections members on the controversy.

He left with a little more understanding.

“I’ve learned a lot today about what they were saying about Bladen County and Robeson County,” Priest said. “So I learned a lot about what they’re trying to stop and I agree we’ve got to stop some of this stuff that is going on in our elections in Bladen County.”

The new election is set for May 14 for Priest’s seat and September 10 for the congressional seat.

The decision comes after heated comments from both Priest and other county commissioners like Ray Britt aimed at the state board.

“They’ve tainted us and not allowed us to redeem ourselves and not allow us to speak,” Britt told WWAY on February 22.

“When Dr. Harris conceded that put an end to a lot of what was going to be said in this hearing,” State Board of Elections Chair Robert Cordle said.

Before voters enter a new election, a new county board must be seated. State board members delayed approving the nominees in order to talk more to state party leaders.

Candidates like Priest return to the campaign trail.

“I think the people of Bladen County are ready for it to stop I really do,” Priest said.

Categories: Bladen, Local

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *